Gizmeo.eu RSS-Feed c1 auf LinkedIn c1 auf DeviantArt c1 bei YouTube Gizmeo.eu als Android-App
    • c1ph4 on wie wird windows 11?: “Es gibt ein gutes Sprichwort aus der IT: „never change a running system“. Wenn W10 für dich funktioniert hat, brauchst…Dez 6, 18:48
    • Michael on wie wird windows 11?: “Auch wenn viele über Windows 11 schimpfen, für mich ist Windows 11 wesentlich besser als Windows 10. Alls Apps laufen,…Dez 6, 13:33
    • Volker on usv fuer den raspberry pi: “Hallo, hat noch jemand die Software für die USV ich finde meine nicht mehr , kann mir da jemand weiter…Jan 4, 13:31
    • c1ph4 on R.I.P. GameRankings!: “Hija, Neil! Thanks for getting back at this and sharing alternatives with us! 🙂 To me „OpenCritic“ sounds very promising…Jan 14, 19:36
    • Neil on R.I.P. GameRankings!: “There are new aggregators that one can use in place of GameRankings.com. There’s https://opencritic.com, not as extensive but offers a…Jan 14, 14:32
www . cipha . net

www . cipha . net
Please use an AMD CPU!
cell processor rox, fuck INTEL
KDE - the Ueber-Desktop-Environment!
msn user die!
aol sucks cock!
explicit content
NEIN zu Softwarepatenten
save the net! net-neutrality is important!
Created, Made & Maintained by AETHYX.EU

Artikel-Schlagworte: „text“

text iq calculation

Algorithms are „cool“ and run anything these days: from your smartwatch to the chatbot you are asking about stock trading options online.

From time to time we find useful algorithms for usage in a specific field; if you do what I do here, measurements about your key performance indicators (KPIs) is all around your texts. So of course this cool text iq calculator (or estimator, as it’s officially called) was of utmost interest to me:


Basically what it does: you input your (preferably English written) text with at least 50 words into the text field and hit the button „Estimate IQ of text author“. The result should be pretty self-explanatory.

For the light-package travelers, here is what to make up of the results by the author of the webapp:

„As accurate as one would expect such an algorithm to be. As „proof“ I have run the algorithm on a few examples, and you can see that the results aren’t surprising (nor should they be).
* Stephen Hawking, using his last paper as the sample, achieves an IQ of 151.
* Alexander Hamilton, using Federalist paper number 6 as the written sample, achieves an IQ of 166.
* Testing different CNN reporters using their articles, I got IQs ranging from 102 to 127.
* Testing different 5G-coronavirus conspiracy theorists using posts from one of their Facebook groups, I got IQs ranging from 75 to 89.“

Let’s run it and see how I’m doing there, shall we? My last five English language contributions here:

https://gizmeo.eu/banksy-in-lisbon/ – Estimated IQ: 102 (above average)
https://gizmeo.eu/armageddon-sounds/ – Estimated IQ: 110 (above average)
https://gizmeo.eu/review-stray/ – Estimated IQ: 107 (above average)
https://gizmeo.eu/neuromancer-vs-my-gpu/ – Estimated IQ: 135 (genius) (hint: I had quotes in here from Cyberpunk mastermind himself in my text, William Gibson…)
https://gizmeo.eu/cpu-dreams/ – Estimated IQ: 101 (above average)

Not bad for a gadget weblog! And English isn’t even my primary language. Take that, CNN, harhar!

Final verdict: if you want to have a quick check if what you are reading in English is not done by a full retard, https://writingtoiq.com/ could be very useful. I didn’t find a source code reference and could do a quick check of the algorithm but the app does what it promises. I can recommend it.

1 Star - nope!2 Stars - meh!3 Stars - good!4 Stars - excellent!5 Stars - supercalifragilisticexpialidocious! (Rate me? // Beitrag bewerten?)

Flattr this!
Ether spenden // Donate Ether
Bitcoin-Spenden hier akzeptiert ^^